If you shoot in JPG and import your photos into Lightroom, you might wonder whether any changes you make in Lightroom degrade image quality.
Under normal circumstances, whenever you open and then save a JPG image it degrades the quality of the image. JPG uses what is known as lossy compression. To keep the file size small it discards information while using sophisticated algorithms to try to make sure that discarding information has minimal visible impact on quality.
But whenever you open and then save a JPG, the problem is compounded. Because what you’re doing in that case is further compressing an already compressed file. Each time you save a JPG you’re discarding more information. So if you’re using something like Photoshop or Gimp or some other image editor to edit your photos, it’s a good idea to work on copies, not the original image, and to minimize the number of times you open, edit, and save the file.1
That said, all is not necessarily lost if you do resave JPGs. Sometimes the result can be quite subtle. Here’s an example where I’ve opened and then saved the same JPG file, repeating the process 10 times. The resulting file is 10 generations removed from the original. For each, I’ve used a JPG compression setting of 60 and haven’t made any other changes at all. The second image definitely is degraded–you can see some banding around the helicopter and Washington Monument, and there are extra lens flare spots in the sky on the second as the gradations get flattened. But for much of the image, the difference is barely noticeable, especially if you view it at smaller sizes (ie. not at 100%).
So you might be wondering… doesn’t that mean that editing in Lightroom degrades the image? And the answer is no.
Lightroom does things differently. It uses what is known as non-destructive editing. When you use the develop module in Lightroom to edit a photo you’re not actually saving over the original file. Instead, Lightroom stores the instructions for the changes you’ve made and then uses those instructions when it displays the image in Lightroom or when you export the file.
That workflow is specifically designed so that it doesn’t touch the original file no matter what changes you make within Lightroom itself. The analogy is if you’re using film, you don’t cut up or edit the original negatives–you always leave the original negative as the master. Lightroom treats your original images, whether they’re RAW, JPG, or TIFF, the same way.
So a normal workflow for editing JPGs in Lightroom might look something like this:
- Import the photos.
- Add metadata in the Library module (caption, title, keywords, location, etc)
- Process the photos in the Develop module (exposure, color balance, contrast, etc).
- Export the photo or use the Print module to print the file.
Throughout all of those steps, your original images aren’t being edited and remain completely intact. If there’s any image degradation being introduced, it’s only when you get to step 4 when you export the file out of Lightroom. If you export to a JPG file, you’ll have a round of compression applied then. But no matter how many times you fiddle with steps 2 and 3, the resulting file will still only be a second-generation JPG.
But there are some qualifications.
The first is that when you export a JPG from Lightroom to JPG format, there’s inevitably some degradation. But it’s only one generation of saving, and you can control how much compression to apply to the exported file.
The second is that if you edit a file outside of Lightroom and save it back into Lightroom as a JPG, you’ve broken the non-destructive workflow. That applies also to round-trip editing when you might use Lightroom’s Edit in Photoshop external editor. If you’re concerned about it and need to edit the file externally, a good option is to have the external editor use a 16-bit TIFF file (or even 8-bit TIFF is better than editing the JPG). The TIFF will be much larger in file size than the JPG, but it’s the best way to preserve the quality if you’re going to edit the file outside of Lightroom.
- There are exceptions, but they’re limited. There is some software that can edit only the metadata block of a JPG file and can resave the file without affecting the section of the file with the visual image data. Other software, like IrfanView, can do certain lossless transformations to JPG such as rotation. In general, though, the rule stands in nearly all cases that resaving a JPG degrades image quality. [↩]
4 thoughts on “Does Editing JPGs in Lightroom Reduce Image Quality?”
This was an excellent, IMPORTANT, clear and brief article, thanks a lot. BIll Hirst
I have a JPEG, family photo, which needs one person deleted. I am looking for someone who can a) delete the individual and b) realign the person who had been to his immediate left, moving her to where he was standing.
Nothing else needed.
Who (what individual/firm) can do this, Frisco area preferred, and what is a reasonable hourly rate? My guess is that this would take significantly less than one hour.
For a small, straightforward job like that, I’d be inclined to look on Fiverr. A search for something like “photo restoration” should bring up some good options. You can contact prospective sellers before commissioning to explain exactly what you need and to find out if it’s something they can help with. Sellers are all of the world and can deliver the results digitally.
For more traditional vendors specifically in the San Francisco area, I’m not familiar with anyone local, but “photo retouching services” or “photo restoration services” should bring up some prospects in local business searches.
Hi! I am using Lightroom 4. I was wondering why my photos become blurry every time I edit in Lightroom and export them. I’m really having a problem with this. Then It also has black lines at the side whenever I uploaded them in facebook. Please help! :) Thank you so much!