Why You Shouldn’t Use a Polarizer on a Wide-Angle Lens

A Circular Polarizer is a landscape photographer’s best friend — until you put it on a wide-angle lens. Then, it can quickly become your enemy, turning beautiful blue skies into ugly, uneven gradients and dark ‘blobs.’ Here is the physics behind why wide-angle lenses and polarizers often don’t mix, and the specific techniques you can use to avoid ruining your shot.

. Photo by David Coleman - havecamerawilltravel.com
Text & Photos By David Coleman
Last Revised & Updated:
Filed Under: Lens Filters

I MAY get commissions for purchases made through links in this post.

Polarizer filters (also known as CPL filters, polarizing filters, or just polarizers) can work wonders in cases where cutting through glare will bring out deeper colors and help peer through transparent reflective surfaces.

They’ll deepen the blues of a blue sky (and add texture to skies in black and white when it might otherwise have been blown out highlights); intensify the color of water, especially when there’s reef or sand not far underneath the surface, or even mountain streams; reduce reflections from a building’s glass windows; and rescue some highlight detail in the sand, snow, or ice.

It can also go a long way to salvaging shooting outdoors in the middle of the day when the sun is at its harshest. I’ve put together some side-by-side examples.

While many post-processing image apps include what they call a polarizer filter effect, a true polarizing effect is something that just can’t really be mimicked effectively by post-processing. It is, in essence, unfakeable.

All of this makes a screw-in polarizer a must-have camera accessory for me.

Having started my photo adventures in Australia, where the sun is just that much harsher, and there’s lots of it to go with lots of water and sand, polarizing filters have long had a permanent place in my camera bag.

That said, polarizers behave a little differently from other filters, and there’s some technique involved in getting the best out of them.

So I thought I’d put together some examples of what to do and what not to do when using them specifically on a wide-angle lens. Because there are considerations when using them on wide-angle lenses that don’t crop up when using them on longer focal-length lenses.

Kayaking in the Arctic

Have Camera Will Travel // Newsletter

Practical field notes, hands-on gear tests, and the fun of exploring the world with a camera in hand.

Why circular polarizer filters work differently from other filters

The main complication with CPL filters is that they’re directional.

That is, they work best at specific angles from the light source. For instance, if you point the camera right at the sun, you’re not going to see much effect (except maybe some unwanted lens flares) no matter how much you rotate the front element of the filter.

Point it at the sky at 90 degrees from the sun, especially on a clear day, and you can see the maximum effect with the right rotation.

But when you’re using a very wide-angle lens, that naturally incorporates a broad swathe of angles from the light source in the scene.

And that’s the problem — some parts of the frame will get more polarizing effect than others. In some scenes, that’s not much of an issue. In others, it can lead to ugly bands in the sky.

Circular polarizing filter before & after shots

. Photo by David Coleman - havecamerawilltravel.com

The first shot was taken without a polarizing filter, while the second was taken with one. Both shots were taken within seconds of each other with the same camera, lens, and aperture and processed with identical settings. The only difference in exposure was that the one of the right was exposed for just under two stops longer to compensate for the light drop off from the polarizing filter. The sun was directly behind me and quite high in the sky. If you look at the center area of the dome and immediate vicinity, you can see why the meter settled on these settings.

The most obvious difference is that the sky is a more intense blue. But the colors in the tree and grass are a little richer, and the highlight details on the Capitol dome are slightly better (easier to see with the original images). The filter also boosts contrast, which helps intensify colors.

Here’s a version where I rotated into portrait orientation and aimed even more of the frame at the sky to exaggerate the effect and make it even more obvious.

Effects of a Polarizing Filter When Used with a Wide-Angle Lens. Photo by David Coleman - havecamerawilltravel.com

Tips for using polarizer filters

But there are some general things to watch out for when using a circular polarizer filter:

  • You’ll lose some light. How much varies from model to model. Typically, cheaper models lose up to around 2 stops. Better-quality (and usually more expensive) will often be a little less, around 1.2 to 1.4 stops. Some CPL filters are known as high-transmission (or HT) filters. They let more light through.
  • They work best with directional light, ideally at 90° to the sun, and don’t work so well outside a certain range.
  • Contrast is increased, which can make shadows appear deeper/darker.
  • And it means screwing and unscrewing a filter each time you want to use it.
  • You’ll also need to adjust the filter for each shot since it consists of two layers of glass, and the outside layer rotates.
  • Adding extra layers of glass can increase the chances of lens flare. Ideally, you wouldn’t be shooting directly at light sources with a polarizer anyway, but the modern coated filters can help mitigate flaring.
  • You’ll need the right size filter for your lens’s diameter or at least a step-up ring.

Tips for using CPL filters on wide-angle lens

There are also some specific quirks when using CPL filters on wide-angle lenses.

As I’ve also shown, they don’t work well on extreme wide-angle lenses. That’s not to say they don’t work at all, just that they need to be used with care.

It’s a problem of physics. The polarizing effect is directly related to the angle from the light source. Extreme wide-angle or fisheye lenses can cover an extraordinarily wide field of view — up to 180° in a few cases.

So if a lot of your frame is blue sky, there’s a good chance you’ll end up with bands of lighter and darker shades across the sky.

A further complication is that you won’t really see the full effect through the viewfinder, and it’s not always easy to see on the camera’s LCD screen with all its reflected light. So you might not notice it until you get your images home onto your computer.

With a wide-angle lens, you can also end up with near-black at the top of the frame. That can be a good or bad thing, depending on what you’re going for. If you look at the sky in the immediate area around the dome in this shot, it’s roughly the same as the shot above. But because this shot is taken at the widest end of a 10-20mm lens and therefore the frame spans the area of the sky 90° from the sun, the blue at the top of the frame is much darker. To my eye, the effect is overkill for this particular shot — the gradient is just too strong and sharp in the context of the whole frame — although there are some subjects where it can be used to great effect.

. Photo by David Coleman - havecamerawilltravel.com

The first image shows an extreme case of banding when zooming out to 10mm (15mm in 35mm equivalent). The polarizing effect is most intense in the middle of the frame, which was at around 90° to the sun. As you get both under and over that 90° the effect reduces, resulting in light bands.

The second shot illustrates that zooming in a bit can eliminate the problem. Where the precise threshold is varies based on things like angle to the sun, what’s in the frame, and what effect you’re aiming for.

Another consideration is that because CPL filters use a double layer of glass, they can be a little thicker than a standard screw-in filter. In some cases — and especially if you’re stacking the CPL with another filter — that can create lens vignetting on the corners and edges of the frame. Some lens manufacturers have therefore come up with a solution: making slim CPL filters. They don’t solve the issue every time, but they can be a useful precaution with wide-angle lenses.

Compatibility of CPL filters with wide-angle lenses

There is another consideration when working with extreme wide-angle lenses. And that is: some wide-angle lenses aren’t compatible with screw-in filters on the front of the lens.

It’s a particular problem with fisheye lenses, but there are more and more high-quality extreme wide-angle lenses coming available. Many of them have a curved front element that’s incompatible with screw-on filters.

What to look for when buying a polarizing filter

  • I’ve put together some side-by-side examples of CPL filters here.
  • There are two classes of polarizing lenses: circular and linear. If you use any modern digital camera with Autofocus (DSLR or Mirrorless), you need a Circular Polarizer. It used to be that linear polarizers were okay for shooting video, but these days most video cameras are mirrorless cameras that also use phase detection autofocus.
  • You need to get the size that matches the thread diameter of your lens. If your lens has a 77mm diameter (usually marked on the lens itself in the form of ∅77), you’ll want a 77mm polarizer. Unfortunately, that means that there’s not a one-size-fits-all screw-on filter, so depending on the lenses you have, you might need to choose which lenses you want to be able to use with a polarizer or buy multiple filters. If you’re really serious about your filters, you can also get polarizers for Lee and Cokin systems that are more forgiving of lens diameter.
  • With very wide-angle lenses, adding what amount to extensions onto the end of the lens risks vignetting in the corners of the frame. Buying polarizing filters designated as “slim” reduces that risk, although they are more expensive.
  • Any of the big filter manufacturers make a good quality filter, including Hoya, B+W, Tiffen, or Nikon.

Polarizing filters and stitched panoramas

In general, it’s not a good idea to use a polarizing filter when shooting for stitched panoramas.

Because the polarizing effect isn’t evenly applied across the frame, if you have blue sky in the frame, you’ll have a lot of trouble avoiding banding across the sky. More effective for darkening the sky is an ND Grad filter, but even then, you have to be very careful about the filter being perfectly horizontal and your frames aligned.

I’ve posted some practical examples of this here.

Found this helpful? Personalize your search results.
Add as Preferred Source
Profile photo of David Coleman | Have Camera Will Travel | Washington DC-based Professional Photographer

David Coleman

I take photos for a living. Now based in Washington, D.C., I have spent the last 30+ years shooting across seven continents — from underwater environments to mountain peaks. My images and time-lapses have appeared in major newspapers, magazines, museums, professional sports stadiums, and even on massive architectural scrims covering world-famous buildings.

I started this site in 2009 to field-test gear, share problem-solving solutions, and share what I've learned in shooting around the world. I only review gear and services I have personally used. No armchair opinions — just real-world experience. Because, for me, the fun is in the making of the photo.

You can see my travel photography here, license my images or buy prints here, or sign up for my Substack.

Conversation

  1. I still am finding it difficult to chose a polarizing filter for my photographic needs.
    what would you suggest as i use a dslr and I am landscape photographer also I need to get rid of those reflections.

    Reply
  2. Good article.
    Short and to the point.
    I take a lot of photos with a Tokina 12-24 F4 lens, of gardens and plants preferebly early in the morning or in the evening but in many cases during the day. As I live in a country with sun glare similar to Australia I bought the a polariser filter from B+W. I read that it was not recommended. Reading your article I will begin to use the filter during the day, 90 degree angle, when photographing plants and hopefully get the rich colors of foliage and flowers.

    Reply
    • Yes, it should start bringing out some more color in the flowers, although in direct sunlight you’re always going to run into the problem of high contrast between shadows and highlights that can work against color with flowers.

      Reply
  3. Hi!
    I have a Tokina 11-16 which is 77mm, and a 18-55 and 55-200 which are 52mm.
    I was wondering if it was a good idea to buy a polarizing filter in 77mm with a step up ring from 52-77.
    Would the gap be too big or would it work just fine?
    Or would you say it would be better to just buy a 52, and forget the polarizer for the 77?
    Thank you :)

    Reply
    • Guillaume,
      I see your have a similar dilemma with the same lenses! Naturally, there is no black-and-white answer. I shoot a mix of ranges. I tried the one big polarizer approach for all and after awhile, one gets tired of switching a filter between lenses.. and adapters.. on top of changing lenses. If you do not change lenses and filters frequently – a one big polarizer approach for all may work for you. Otherwise, get the polarizer for the telephoto first (and possibly the 18-55), then one for 18-55 and then the wide angle. If you require good detail in your photos, do not settle for cheap polarizers to tie you over.. the temptation is great but so is the potential disappointment. Stay the course and save until you can afford a grade of polarizer that meets the image quality acceptable to you. The Hoya HDs are an excellent example of a quality enthusiast and semi-pro level filter, based on reviews while having a good price point. Good luck and keep shooting!

      Reply
  4. These are difficult to find for cell phone cameras. since I am going on a long backpack trip to Patagonia I need the filter but not the weight of a DSLR. I did find one from Apexel. The twisting was impossible and I though it was broken, until I used a tiny amount of WD40 lubricant. I’m hoping this will help. I don’t expect DSLR quality, But this will help a lot. Most folks don’t understand how polarizing works or appreciate the effects. Thanks for your article.

    Reply
  5. Thanks for the wonderful post, David. I was trying to find out before/after pics of someone using a circular polarizer for a wide-angle lens.

    I’m currently using Sigma 10-20mm wide and looking into a Tiffen 77mm circular polarizer. I like your example a lot (a picture is worth a thousand words). I guess I’ll have to test several situations myself to decide if I go wide open at 10mm as your 18mm shot makes a huge difference.

    And I agree with you on panoramas. I have a Sigma 8mm fisheye for 360-degree panoramas and definitely wouldn’t use a filter during the shots.

    Reply

Leave a Comment